Git Is Excel at Merging Multiple Independent Branches

NCommander states his experience that Git is superior at merging multiple independent branches comparing to some other popular open source version control.

having using both SVN and git heavily over the course of years, SVN’s branching and merging support is not much better than CVS in many ways. Git on the other hand makes it trivial to merge multiple independent branches togethers, figure out who did what, and help keep patches across multiple trees (we’ve got some patches going across slashcode and rehash right now). I’ve also use bzr (and to a much lesser extent, hg), and neither is as good at git at handling branches and stuff. bzr is basically decentralized SVN. hg is fast, but it seems a bit clumsy to merge from multiple heads.

Source:
Announcing GitTorrent: A Decentralized GitHub | SoylentNews

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

About Ferry T.H.

I'm just your fellow human being.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: